Search
  • Eng
    • Eng
    • Frh
  • USD
    • USD
    • EUR
  • (281) 241-1994
  • My account
    • Checkout
    • Cart
    • Wishlist
00
00
  • Home
  • Shop
  • About Us
    • Jewelry Candles Company
    • Our Fragrances
    • Our Containers
    • Contests Winners
    • Unrivaled Candles Payment Methods
    • Privacy Policy
    • Return and Refund Policy
    • Shipping Policies
    • Terms of Service
  • Blog
Unrivaled Candles
Unrivaled Candles
  • Reviews
    • Blog Reviews
    • Amazon Reviews
    • Facebook Reviews
    • Unrivaledcandles.com Reviews
  • Retailers
  • Contact Us
  • Become A Wholesaler

  • Home
  • Forums

arielwiese96339

  • Profile
  • Topics Started
  • Replies Created
  • Engagements
  • Favorites

@arielwiese96339

Profile

Registered: 1 month ago

The Difference Between Good and Great Minutes—Training Makes It Clear

 
Meeting Minutes: The Silent Productivity Killer in Every Boardroom - The Truth HR Won't Tell You
 
 
Walking into another pointless session last Thursday, I observed the same familiar scene happen.
 
 
The reality that most organisations overlook: most minute taking is a total squandering of human talent that produces the pretence of documentation while actually blocking productive work from happening.
 
 
The record keeping obsession has achieved proportions of bureaucratic madness that would be hilarious if it wasn't costing enormous amounts in lost business value.
 
 
The challenge isn't that record keeping is worthless - it's that we've turned record keeping into a bureaucratic ritual that benefits no one and wastes enormous portions of useful working hours.
 
 
The incident that convinced me that workplace minute taking has completely lost any relevance to real organisational purpose:
 
 
I attended a annual review conference where they had literally employed an specialist minute taker at $90 per hour to create comprehensive documentation of the discussions.
 
 
This person was paid $120,000 per year and had fifteen years of professional knowledge. Instead of participating their professional expertise to the decision making they were functioning as a expensive note taker.
 
 
But here's the kicker: the company was simultaneously implementing several separate technological documentation systems. They had intelligent recording systems, digital capture of the whole session, and several team members making their individual extensive notes .
 
 
The session addressed strategic issues about project development, but the person best positioned to advise those choices was entirely focused on capturing every minor remark instead of contributing meaningfully.
 
 
The total investment in staff resources for recording this individual meeting was over $1,500, and literally zero of the documentation was subsequently used for one meaningful purpose.
 
 
The madness was completely lost on them. They were wasting their most qualified contributor to generate records that nobody would genuinely review again.
 
 
The promise of digital simplification has created problems completely when it comes to meeting record keeping.
 
 
Now instead of simple handwritten notes, organisations expect comprehensive recordings, task assignment tracking, electronic records, and connection with multiple project tracking tools.
 
 
I've worked with companies where people now spend additional time organising their digital documentation records than they used in the real sessions that were documented.
 
 
The administrative load is overwhelming. People are not participating in decisions more effectively - they're merely managing more digital complexity.
 
 
Here's the uncomfortable truth that will likely anger all compliance department in corporate Australia: extensive minute taking is often a risk management theatre that has minimal connection to do with meaningful responsibility.
 
 
The genuine regulatory requirements for corporate minutes in nearly all Australian professional environments are dramatically simpler than the complex protocols that most organisations maintain.
 
 
I've consulted with companies that waste enormous amounts of resources on complex documentation processes because somebody once told them they needed extensive minutes for legal purposes.
 
 
The result? Significant expenditures in effort and money for record keeping processes that deliver no real value while significantly reducing business productivity.
 
 
True accountability comes from specific decisions, not from detailed transcripts of all word uttered in a session.
 
 
So what does sensible meeting record keeping actually look like?
 
 
Determine the essential content that really has impact and ignore the other 80%.
 
 
I suggest a basic format: decision summary, responsibility assignments, and timeline summary.
 
 
Any else is documentation bloat that generates absolutely no value to the team or its outcomes.
 
 
Second, share the minute taking task instead of appointing it to your highest valuable group participants.
 
 
A regular departmental check in won't need the same degree of minute taking as a strategic conference that makes critical financial commitments.
 
 
Create straightforward categories: Minimal records for informal check ins, Simple decision documentation for operational team meetings, Thorough record keeping for legally significant meetings.
 
 
The investment of professional record keeping assistance is typically significantly cheaper than the productivity impact of requiring expensive people waste their time on clerical duties.
 
 
Third, examine the belief that all discussions needs detailed minutes.
 
 
The majority of standard conferences - update sessions, brainstorming workshops, team catch ups - shouldn't need extensive documentation.
 
 
Reserve detailed record keeping for conferences where agreements have contractual significance, where multiple stakeholders need common understanding, or where detailed action plans require managed over long durations.
 
 
The secret is creating deliberate determinations about documentation approaches based on genuine circumstances rather than using a uniform approach to all sessions.
 
 
The annual cost of professional administrative support is invariably much cheaper than the opportunity cost of having expensive executives waste their time on administrative duties.
 
 
Use digital systems to improve productive record keeping, not to create more bureaucratic burden.
 
 
Straightforward approaches like shared responsibility monitoring tools, digital session reports, and voice to text technology can significantly eliminate the manual work needed for meaningful meeting records.
 
 
The critical factor is implementing technology that serve your decision making objectives, not platforms that become ends in themselves.
 
 
The objective is digital tools that supports focus on meaningful discussion while automatically managing the essential records.
 
 
The aim is automation that facilitates concentration on important discussion while automatically processing the necessary documentation functions.
 
 
What I need each business executive knew about effective workplaces:
 
 
Meaningful governance comes from specific commitments and regular follow up, not from extensive transcripts of meetings.
 
 
Productive meetings produce clear decisions, not perfect documentation.
 
 
In contrast, I've seen companies with elaborate minute taking procedures and terrible performance because they mistook paper trails for actual accountability.
 
 
The benefit of a conference resides in the effectiveness of the commitments established and the implementation that follow, not in the detail of the records produced.
 
 
The actual worth of every session exists in the quality of the decisions established and the implementation that result, not in the thoroughness of the documentation created.
 
 
Prioritise your attention on creating environments for productive problem solving, and the accountability will follow automatically.
 
 
Invest your attention in creating excellent conditions for excellent strategic thinking, and appropriate record keeping will develop automatically.
 
 
After investing over fifteen years working with organisations enhance their meeting productivity, here's my firm conviction:
 
 
Minutes should support results, not substitute for decision making.
 
 
Record keeping needs to serve outcomes, not dominate productive work.
 
 
Every approach else is merely corporate ritual that consumes precious energy and distracts from real business value.
 
 
If you have any issues relating to wherever and how to use minute taker role, you can get in touch with us at the web-site.

Website: https://affordablecoaching.mypixieset.com/minute-taking-course/


Forums

Topics Started: 0

Replies Created: 0

Forum Role: Participant

Unrivaled Candles
  • Address: P.O. Box 7722, Pasadena, TX, USA 77503
  • Phone: 281-241-1994
  • Email : info@unrivaledcandles.com
  • Working Days/Hours: Mon - Sun / 9:00 AM - 8:00 PM

IMPORTANT LINKS

Return and Refund Policy

Become A Wholesaler

Amazon Reviews

Privacy Policy

Retailers

FAQs

 

Subscribe now and get special offers

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today

    © 2016-2020 Unrivaled Candles All Rights Reserved.
    Design & Development by Unrivaled Candles Team

    Follow Us

    Facebook Twitter Youtube Instagram
    • Home
    • Shop
    • About Us
      • Jewelry Candles Company
      • Our Fragrances
      • Our Containers
      • Contests Winners
      • Unrivaled Candles Payment Methods
      • Privacy Policy
      • Return and Refund Policy
      • Shipping Policies
      • Terms of Service
    • Blog